The globalist underground thinks that power needs terror. Former senior advisor to President Bill Clinton, Robert Shapiro, says that the only thing which can rescue Barack Obama’s increasingly tenuous grip on power as his national approval continues to plunge is a terror attack on the scale of Oklahoma City or 9/11. This is another startling reminder that major terrorist events serve to benefit those in authority.
Months ago, Shapiro remarked about Obama’s “growing credibility crisis” and fears on behalf of Democrats that they could lose not only the White House but also the Senate to Republicans. Shapiro makes it clear that Obama is relying on an October surprise in the form of a terror attack to rescue his presidency. Politics is often all about fear, and this is no exception.
“He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”
This is real food for thought since Shapiro was undersecretary of commerce for economic affairs during Clinton’s tenure in the Oval Office. He also acted as principal economic adviser to Clinton in his 1991-1992 campaign. According to various sources, he is a prominent globalist who has attended numerous Bilderberg Group meetings over the past decade.
Shapiro sees the necessity for a terror attack to be launched to give Obama the opportunity to unite the country around an agenda in the name of fighting terrorists, just as President Bush did in the aftermath of 9/11 when his approval ratings catapulted from around 50% to well above 80%.
Bill Clinton was able to extinguish an anti-incumbent rebellion which was brewing in the mid 1990’s by exploiting the Oklahoma City bombing to pin down his political enemies as right-wing extremists. Anti-incumbent fever is dominating the political climate once again, with “the establishment” facing serious challenges from Tea Party candidates.
CNN host Rick Sanchez admitted months ago that the deadly bombings in Uganda which killed 74 people were “helpful” to the military-industrial complex agenda to expand the war on terror into Africa. This same pattern has repeated over and over.
Since some rationalize that a terror attack on U.S. soil will only serve to rescue Barack Obama’s failing presidency, and will do absolutely nothing to further the aims of any right wing extremists the attack is blamed on, who should we suspect as the masterminds behind any such acts of terror? A political battle of wills resides in the terrorist agenda.
Undoubtedly, the suspects that are culprits in the event of a domestic terror attack in the United States are the people “that Obama fronts”, globalists who are desperate to neutralize the growing success of grass-roots movements who have ridden a wave of rising resentment against big government as a means of obtaining real political power. All this is food for thought where terrorism is concerned. Globalists could be involved in a little masterminding all on their own.