Busted: Bankers and The Global Economy

January 9, 2011

Food Safety Bill Grants FDA Authority to Police Foreign Nations

Of all the talk about the USA Food Safety Bill, S.510, it is likely that few have actually read the language in the bill. Do the lawmakers actually know what is in it? The Food Safety Modernization Act allows the FDA to set up foreign offices.

Section 305 is entitled “BUILDING CAPACITY OF FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS WITH RESPECT TO FOOD SAFETY,” which allows the FDA the full authority to set up offices in foreign countries to dictate the food safety plans of foreign governments for any food coming into the United States. This is noted on page 217 of the Act.

SEC. 308. FOREIGN OFFICES OF THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION.
(a) IN GENERAL. – The Secretary shall establish offices of the Food and Drug Administration in foreign countries selected by the Secretary.

It then goes on to say:

(a) The Secretary shall, not later than 2 years of the date of enactment of this Act, develop a comprehensive plan to expand the technical, scientific, and regulatory food safety capacity of foreign governments, and their respective food industries, from which foods are exported to the United States.

This will allow for the global expansion of the FDA and an huge expansion of government jobs and government authority, most likely to be relegated to multinational corporations.

This Food Safety Act is to be developed under consultation to the Department of Homeland Security as well as the U.S. Treasury. As the bill states:

(b) Consultation – In developing the plan under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of Agriculture, Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the United States Trade Representative, and the Secretary of Commerce, representatives of the food industry, appropriate foreign government officials, nongovernmental organizations that represent the interests of consumers, and other stakeholders.

What does the Department of Homeland Security have to do with an FDA food safety plan? Why is the U.S. Treasury involved in the food supply? The history of the Federal Reserve probably holds more of the answers here than you would care to admit.

Data sharing and international law are a big part of the Act. You can view this yourself on page 195 of the bill (at the link above).

(c) Plan – The plan developed under subsection (a) shall include, as appropriate, the following: “Provisions for secure electronic data sharing.”

This is so that the FDA can electronically track and monitor the food production activities of foreign nations. That way, if somebody in Spain tries to sell raw almonds to the USA, the FDA can make sure those almonds are irradiated or fumigated with chemicals first. Raw almonds are so dangerous they have actually been outlawed in States.

“Training of foreign governments and food producers on United States requirements for safe food” is designed to mandate the FDA’s “dead food” agenda to other nations.  This may effectively export the corporate agenda of health borne disease that the USA food industry seeks to sow. This will put more money in the pockets of the U.S. Pharmacy Corporations, expanding their power internationally, much like the U.S. has done with other industries, sending jobs overseas. There is no provision to mandate any pesticide levels where food safety is concerned.

The FDA will be allowed to “harmonize” the USA food and dietary supplement industries which could outlaw healthy doses of vitamins and minerals. RDA standards are bare minimums at best for minimal health needs.

Centralized power is likely to fuel large food corporations as they take over food production markets per government mandate, ensuring huge profits, all to the lowest bidder while the health of the nation flags. All the while, food engineers Monsanto, DuPont and other agricultural giants are likely benefactors as they push their proprietary seed and genetically modified plants on the world.

Thanks to Wikileaks, the world knows that the global GMO conspiracy is real and ripe for a corporate power grab.

Advertisements

November 21, 2010

Old News, New News

Filed under: banking, central bank, corporatism, economy, federal reserve, globalization, recession — Tags: , , , , , , — digitaleconomy @ 11:26 am

“Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through the process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world. By dividing the voter through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance. It is thus by discreet action we can secure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished.”

– Montagu Norman, Governor of The Bank Of England, addressing the United States Bankers’ Association, NYC 1924

 

November 7, 2010

Obama Admits Decline of US Dominance

Filed under: business, corporatism, economy, globalization, government, money, politics, recession — Tags: , , , , , , , , , — digitaleconomy @ 6:27 pm

Today, President Barack Obama said that the USA was no longer in a position to “meet the rest of the world economically on our terms.”

Speaking at a town hall meeting in Mumbai, he said,

“I do think that one of the challenges that we are going face in the US, at a time when we are still recovering from the financial crisis is, how do we respond to some of the challenges of globalization? The fact of the matter is that for most of my lifetime and I’ll turn 50 next year – the US was such an enormously dominant economic power, we were such a large market, our industry, our technology, our manufacturing was so significant that we always met the rest of the world economically on our terms. And now because of the incredible rise of India and China and Brazil and other countries, the US remains the largest economy and the largest market, but there is real competition.”

“This will keep America on its toes. America is going to have to compete. There is going to be a tug-of-war within the US between those who see globalization as a threat and those who accept we live in a open integrated world, which has challenges and opportunities.”

President Obama disagreed with those who saw globalization as evil. He did warn that protectionist impulses in the USA will get stronger if Americans don’t see trade bringing in gains for them.

“If the American people feel that trade is just a one-way street where everybody is selling to the enormous US market but we can never sell what we make anywhere else, then the people of the US will start thinking that this is a bad deal for us and it could end up leading to a more protectionist instinct in both parties, not just among Democrats but also Republicans. So, that we have to guard against.”

President Obama noted that America could not continue to promote trade at its own expense at a time when economic power in India and China is rising. “There has to be reciprocity in our trading relationships and if we can have those kind of conversations – fruitful, constructive conversation about how we produce win-win situations, then I think we will be fine.”

November 4, 2010

U.S. Fed Opens New Office

Filed under: banking, business, central bank, corporatism, economy, federal reserve, recession — Tags: , , , , , , , — digitaleconomy @ 12:58 pm

“The Federal Reserve Board on Thursday established the Office of Financial Stability Policy and Research and appointed Board economist J. Nellie Liang as its director.

The office will bring together economists, banking supervisors, markets experts, and others in the Federal Reserve who will be dedicated to supporting the Board’s financial stability responsibilities. The office will develop and coordinate staff efforts to identify and analyze potential risks to the financial system and the broader economy, including through the monitoring of asset prices, leverage, financial flows, and other market risk indicators; follow developments at key institutions; and analyze policies to promote financial stability. It will also support the supervision of large financial institutions and the Board’s participation on the Financial Stability Oversight Council.”

“The Office of Financial Stability Policy and Research brings together a skilled group of people with a wide range of expertise to focus solely on financial stability,” Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said. “The financial stability team will play an important role in implementing the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, in our oversight of systemically important financial institutions, and in our overall surveillance of the financial markets and the economy.”

http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/other/20101104a.htm

 

July 7, 2009

Pope: Economy Needs Ethics

Without internal forms of solidarity and mutual trust, the market cannot completely fulfill its proper economic function. And today it is this trust which has ceased to exist, and the loss of trust is a grave loss.” According to the Vatican, the economy needs ethics in order to function correctly, just as the implementation of ethical financing and systems of micro-credit and micro-finance indicate. In development programs, the principle of the centrality of the human person must be preserved, while international organizations might question the actual effectiveness of their bureaucratic and administrative structure. This is one of the central messages of Benedict XVIs new encyclical Caritas in Veritate that was published July 7th and signed by the Pope. If you have been following this blog, you know what is up right now. I don’t need to say another word. ~ E. Manning

March 1, 2009

U.S. Budget Goes Bust

obama-camp-lejeuneThe economy is in a tailspin, contracting at a 6.2 percent pace in the last three months of 2008: the worst performance in decades. The White House announced that it will take a 36-percent stake in Citigroup in the hope of keeping it afloat amid huge toxic debt and a continuing crisis of confidence. These are ominous reminders that the nation has critical decisions to make in order to turn things around. President Obama appears to have ditched the Bush administration’s Washington-style budget sleight-of-hand with the attempt to honestly portray what the government will actually spend. In the mind of President Obama, his truth in budgeting approach is designed to help Americans make informed choices. That is exactly what Americans have been doing without government so far. We react to the failures of government, business and even ourselves. Even so, President Obama reveals that $3.6 trillion is to be spent in 2010, with almost $1.2 trillion of it borrowed.

What is President Obama’s message to taxpayers and Capitol Hill? We need to quit magical thinking. All the thing the nation’s needs will not pay for themselves. Laying the groundwork for a strong economy in the future isn’t without cost. Does America want to kick fossil fuels out for a greener future? How will America reform how we pay for health care, so that the nation can get more for our dollars and reduce the ranks of the uninsured? How do we keep Medicare solvent with the swelling rank of the disabled and a steadily growing retirement community? The nation needs a larger federal contribution for our schools. How will the nation repair and maintain roads, bridges, airports and mass transit? Now there is talk of building a modern energy grid. The president is counting on the economy to be growing by 2011. He plans on halving the deficit by 2013 through taxation of the upper class and perhaps through restricting corporate taxes loopholes and offshore banking. Keeping a deficit in the same place is difficult enough with the proposed spending required to save the nation and its’ current power and financial structure. That deficit reduction remains to be seen. Along the way, the nation must discontinue the practice of borrowing, spending and passing the bill to our kids to deal with. We just haven’t figured out how to do that yet.

You can argue that money isn’t everything, but you can’t argue that fact when you are in government and money is everything. ~ E. Manning

November 7, 2008

Obama Promises Change: Fed Wants Control

conflict-of-power Obama FedWith the election of the new 44th U.S. President of the United States, the mandate of U.S. politics has been clarified. The hope of much of the American populace has been ignited. The Federal Reserve and the global consortium of central bankers aren’t nearly so excited, showing a typical understated and conservative resistance to change that doesn’t put them in the driver’s seat.

Apparently Kevin Warsh, Governor of the Federal Reserve believes that the world should look upon the financial hell of the last year with a hint of reminisce. “This challenge of creating a new financial architecture is hardly unique to the United States. The difficult choices made by policymakers and market participants around the globe will have real implications for future growth prospects.” That is in fact what many world leaders are intently interested in at the projected global financial summit that is planned at U.N. headquarters in New York City. The wild promotion of the financial summit is driven by the desire to change the current financial architecture.

Warsh spews plenty of bankerspeak which essentially boils down to this summary: the new financial architecture must be properly understood, in full recognition of current business relationships and restrained accordingly. Not so coincidentally, this recommendation would keep the control firmly among the International Society of Bankers, the loosely amalgamated brotherhood of central bankers headquartered in Switzerland and Rome.

Warsh correctly blames the current financial crisis on inadequate market discipline, excessive reliance on credit ratings coupled with poor credit and liquidity risk-management practices by many financial firms. However, until recently, the Federal Reserve has been unwilling to promote any changes, instead promoting the vaguely governmental mantra of financial literacy.

Warsh recognizes the global economic challenge, but does not admire the “implementation of well-intended housing policies.” Instead, the central banking consortium clearly sees the new financial architecture solely in business terms that will fuel economic growth, a clear promotion of continued Republican financial policy that has been gradually adopted over the last several decades. In essense, the advance of Republican power, policies and laissez-faire trickle-down economics has bolstered the role of not only the Federal Reserve, but the global power of central bankers through the power and prestige of the dollar, now firmly under their control.

The new Obama administration has more to fight than mere Republican policies. They must come squarely to terms with global bankers that currently hold the keys to their financial success. With the current fiscal situation of this nation regarding the fiat money of the dollar, the bankers have politicians largely where they want them. Arguably, John F. Kennedy lost his life as a result of opposing the global central banking community. They still hold the same power of life and death in the world today, only more so. ~ E. Manning

Older Posts »

Blog at WordPress.com.