Busted: Bankers and The Global Economy

November 16, 2011

Financial Nonsense of GDP & Jobless Figures

Third quarter GDP numbers have no relation to reality  says John Williams of Shadow Stats. He believes that unemployment hasn’t really recovered from the 2001 recession. GDP has become a nonsense number, worthless in terms of having any meaning in terms of the real economy.

August 1, 2009

Recession Continues: July 2009 Report

Filed under: economy, recession, tracking — Tags: , , , , , — digitaleconomy @ 12:45 pm

072009recession

February 17, 2009

Federal Reserve Gets Religious Vision

But don’t be quick to forget that the seeds of the current global financial crisis were sown by the near total breakdown of mortgage-lending standards and banking-industry oversight. Most of this can be laid squarely at the feet of arrogant economic and political theoreticians who viewed the borrowing public as little more than a bunch of statistics and a springboard for their next personal bonus or career move.

elizabeth-duke-governorNow the Federal Reserve Board has a new religious vision in the form of eager, bright-eyed and perhaps the naivety of Governor Elizabeth Duke. In her speech to community bankers in Phoenix, Arizona, yesterday, she revealed her vision like a campaign pledge:

* I believe that the banking business plays a special role in the economy and carries with it special responsibilities. These responsibilities come from the role of the financial system as the circulatory system of our economy. And with respect to insured depository institutions, given the federal safety net provided by deposit insurance, access to the payment system, and the availability of discount window borrowings, bankers have a responsibility to operate in a safe and sound manner.
* I believe that rigorous supervision and enforcement are necessary companions to regulation. One of the lessons we have learned in the current crisis is that different levels of supervision and enforcement can cause problems, even when institutions are ostensibly following the same regulations. Nowhere was this more evident than in the mortgage origination market, in which banking organizations and firms outside the banking supervision system were all originating mortgages but were subject to very different levels of oversight.
* I believe in the separation of banking and commerce. The lending policies of banks should have as their purpose the efficient channeling of savers’ funds to their most productive uses. The allowance of banks to affiliate with commercial firms threatens the ability of banks to continue to serve as efficient and objective intermediaries of credit and has the potential to expose banks to the operational, financial, and reputational risks of commercial affiliates. It also has the potential to extend to commercial affiliates the federal safety net afforded to banks in recognition of their role in the economy.
* I believe that a bank holding company should act as a source of financial and managerial strength to its banking subsidiaries. That is, a bank holding company should stand ready to use available resources to provide adequate capital funds to its subsidiary banks during periods of financial stress or adversity, and it should maintain the financial flexibility and capital-raising capacity to obtain additional resources for assisting its subsidiary banks. The reasoning behind these functions is that a bank holding company derives certain benefits at the corporate level that result, in part, from the ownership of an institution that has access to the federal safety net, including deposit insurance. This principle is, naturally, very familiar to almost all bankers, since it is embedded in Federal Reserve regulation, but it is worth repeating from time to time.
* Finally, I believe that strict adherence to consumer protection is necessary to protect consumers and the financial system as a whole. We have now witnessed the severe consequences of inadequate consumer understanding of financial products and of lending to consumers without regard to their ability to sustain the payments. Reasonable regulations, such as the Federal Reserve’s recent rule changes for mortgages and credit cards, can help protect consumers and encourage responsible lending.

seeds-of-victorySure Ms. Duke is a banker-type. For a banker, her commitment in the face of the old cronies in the good old boys’ network of banking is a breath of fresh air, bordering on a religious outlook when we have a U.S. President that is similar in nature. Are the winds of change in the air? Is Ms. Duke the inspiration that ho-hum greedy bankers need? Will the Federal Reserve get the religion of financial literacy where people are concerned? Even more important, will they apply financial literacy to themselves? Are these the seeds of victory that we need or are we too late? Perhaps a little selfless vision never hurt anyone. Then again, do you believe it?

~ E. Manning

January 27, 2009

U.S. Unemployment Reality

John Williams, founder of Shadow Government Statistics, calculates that the jobless rate is a full 10 percent higher than the government is reporting.

Unemployment: Jiggering with Accounting

Unemployment: The Skinny about Obama’s Stimulus

January 10, 2009

Unemployment: Jiggering with Accounting

abc-news-job-loss1102008There is no question that American job losses over the last year have been stunning. Whether Americans like to admit the truth or not, over time the Federal Government has demonstrated that they feel compelled to dicker with statistics, often simply to make a single administration look better, if that is possible. As a result, most of the statistics and measures that are commonly published do not use the same standards as measures used consistently for decades. Instead, dickering with statistics has become a legendary propaganda tool, usually to make whatever the statistics are supposed to prove appear much better. This “dumbing down” of statistics is legendary with the Federal Reserve, notably in changing from M-3 statistics and is prevalent in Unemployment Statistics. You will find similar cheats when comparing state economies across the United States. It is all about the perception of the public and the attempt to more evenly distribute data.

At this posting, the “government darling” unemployment rate is 7.2%. By the end of 2009, this economist expects the unemployment rate to approximately double to just at 15%, although a proliferation of additional and unknown failures  could easily bring that number higher. Meanwhile, the real statistics that Americans are actually living with are higher as demonstrated in the chart below.

Chart of U.S. Unemployment
The passion of John Williams is to keep up with older and usually more accurate measures of economic statistics. The details at shadowstats.com, if you care to examine them, demonstrates the manipulation of data by government officials to their own ends. The average  and often clueless American citizen often wonders why he or she is having such a hard time treading economic water.  John Williams sheds a lot of light on this situation and has been doing so for years. This chart shows an unemployment rate approaching 18%. It all depends whom you choose to believe. ~ E. Manning

Blog at WordPress.com.